Walston Legal Group in San Francisco
Home - Attorneyabout our attorneysAttorneysAttorney Practice AreasContact an Attorney

Employment LawDiscriminationSexual HarassmentWrongful termination

 

 

· We have aggressive attorneys who successfully litigate employment cases including sexual harassment, and will stand up for you!

· We can help you recover money for damage to your property and reputation, as well as physical and emotional injuries.

· Our Principal Attorney, Mr. Walston, teaches the subject to practicing attorneys.

· We have never lost a jury trial!

· We will represent you for FREE until you recover. If you don’t win, we don’t charge!

 

 

 

Home >> Employment Law >> Sexual Harassment >> How a court reviews a claim

Attorney Representation in San Francisco, California since 1989

SAN FRANCISCO SEXUAL HARASSMENT ATTORNEY

Sexual Harassment

sexual harassmentHow does a court review a sexual harassment claim?

Definition

In the federal context, sexual harassment is considered to be a form of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accordingly to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) "unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when submission to or rejection of this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment."

  • There are two different types of sexual harassment claims, although the manner in which a court will distinguish between the two for purposes of deciding whether harassment has occurred has become blurred in recent years:
    • Quid Pro Quo: Sexual harassment that occurs when a supervisor or one in an authority position requests sex, or a sexual relationship, in exchange for not firing or otherwise punishing the employee, or in exchange for favors, such as promotions or raises.
    • Hostile Work Environment: Sexual harassment that occurs through the presence of demeaning or sexual photographs, jokes or threats. The inappropriate behavior or conduct must be so pervasive as to, as the name implies, create an intimidating and offensive work environment.
  • Each state is different with regard to protections against sexual harassment. For example, Alabama allows for an employee to sue an employer for sexual harassment based on a theory of invasion of privacy. Vermont law, in comparison, requires every employer to adopt a policy against sexual harassment. Other states have no specific law prohibiting or punishing sexual harassment.

Applying the Definition

  • While it is easy to define sexual harassment, it is very difficult to apply that definition to a set of particular facts. Court opinions can seem inconsistent about whether sexual harassment has occurred, sometimes deciding differently in cases with very similar facts particularly in hostile work environment cases where it is more difficult than in quid pro quo situations to prove that harassment occurred.

Example: Courts may disagree on whether the posting of one piece of pornographic or sexually offensive material is sufficient to create a hostile work environment.

Example: One court may hold that an unwelcome advance (such as an employee asking another coworker out on a date) does not constitute sexual harassment because it did not rise, in that particular case, to the level of pervasive behavior. In another case, however, the court may rule that based on the specific facts of that situation, a rebuffed request for a date could constitute sexual harassment.

  • The U.S. Supreme Court has held that employers may defend themselves in hostile work environment cases brought against them for actions of a supervisor or managerial-level employee by arguing that they took reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment and made efforts to correct harassing behavior. Employers may also argue that they are not liable if an employee did not take advantage of available reporting or remedial measures to complain about incidents of sexual harassment

Factors for Review

Factors a court will consider in hostile work environment cases include:

  • Frequency of the alleged inappropriate behavior.
  • Severity of the behavior.
  • Conduct of the victim.
  • Context of the alleged harassment.
  • Size of the employer's business.
  • Nature of the employer's business.
  • In a hostile work environment claim, whether a reasonable person in the position of the plaintiff would have thought the environment to be hostile.

Note: If the alleged victim willingly participated in sexual banter or risqué jokes, it will be more difficult for them to prove that they have actually been harassed.

 

 

If you are a victim of sexual harassment in the workplace, there are steps that you can take to stop the problem and protect your right to a legal remedy. Talk to a top San Francisco criminal attorney to discuss the facts of your particular situation and ensure that your legal rights are protected.

San Francisco criminal attorneys

CONTACT US!

THE WALSTON LEGAL GROUP

222 Columbus Avenue, Suite 408

San Francisco, California 94133

Tel: (415) 956-9200

Fax: (415) 956-9205

Email: info@walstonlaw.com

scales of justice
criminal defense
FREE CONSULT!
TELL US ABOUT YOUR CASE
Name: 
Phone Number:
Email:
Give us a brief description of what happened?

Our law offices are located at

222 Columbus Avenue, Suite 408

San Francisco, California 94133

 

Home | About Us |Attorneys | Practice Areas | Contact Us | Attorney Referrals | Sitemap

 

Attorney Representation in San Francisco, California since 1989


San Francisco criminal attorney Disclaimer: The criminal law, dui, dwi, personal injury, accidents, medical malpractice, civil rights, litigation defense, and employment law information on this website should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship

Walston Criminal Attorneys